|

Two recent conversations have reminded me of the importance of separating business enterprises for liability protection. I was helping a Sunnyvale real estate investor negotiate a commercial loan extension with a bank, and was thrilled that we had planned well in the past to separate all of his major properties into separate LLCs. It gave the bank a lot less power in negotiating against us – my client’s other properties were safe from this potential liability, but could be used as additional collateral if he chose to do so. At the same time, I was talking to a Mountain View manufacturing client about the risk of a potential employee lawsuit and realized that, due to some bad advice in the past that my client got from another advisor, he was holding real estate in the corporation thereby making the real estate subject to any liabilities of the company.

The example I often use is that each of your business enterprises or major assets is like a domino. Putting all of your dominoes in one entity means that a single domino falling can knock the others down too. Separating your dominoes into multiple entities means that if one entity is subjected to a lawsuit, the assets in the other entities should be insulated. Therefore, if my Mountain View client is faced with a large judgment on his employee problem, thanks to the appreciation in the real estate, the company looks like a really deep pocket.

Deciding how many entities to form, and how to separate your assets, is a complex cost/benefit analysis that depends highly on your level of comfort with risk. A good rule of thumb is to separate unrelated businesses (such as manufacturing and real estate, operating companies and investments). For real estate, consider grouping properties by the level of liability and the equity in each property, as well as the location of the properties. Also check with your professional advisors, such as your attorney and CPA, for liability, tax and insurance issues that could affect your decision.

|

In my San Jose law practice, I often meet with clients who tell me they want to form a certain type of entity, and then proceed to tell me some facts that actually disqualify them from that form of entity. Even worse is when the client tells me that some other advisor told them they should be that form of entity. Recently, I met with a Cupertino real estate investor who said his financial advisor told him he should form an LLP for his property (he was not eligible to be an LLP). In Silicon Valley, we have a lot of do-it-yourselfers who form their own company online and then regret their ill-informed choice of entity and have to pay an attorney a lot more to fix the problem than they would have paid to do it right in the first place.

Here are some basic facts about LPs, LLPs and LLCs in California to help you make a more knowledgeable initial decision.

LP: This stands for “Limited Partnership.” In a limited partnership, at least one partner must be a general partner, which means that partner will be personally responsible for any liabilities of the partnership, as well as partnership decisions. The limited partners are not responsible for partnership liabilities, but also do not have any say in the management of the partnership.

Continue reading ›

|

As usual, January is a time when people think about getting their business in order and consider the ‘choice of entity’ question. Already this month I have received calls from two contractors, one from San Jose and one from Sunnyvale, who want to form an entity for their construction business. I was able to give them the news that, as of January 1, 2011, the California Corporations Code finally allows a California limited liability company (“LLC”) to operate as a licensed contractor. However, the Contractors’ State License Board is only required to start processing applications no later than January 1, 2012.

For years, contractors were limited by a provision in the LLC Act that said an LLC may not “render professional services, as defined in Section 13401 and in Section 13401.3, in this state.” Sections 13401 defines professional services as “any type of professional services that may be lawfully rendered only pursuant to a license, certification, or registration authorized by the Business and Professions Code, the Chiropractic Act, or the Osteopathic Act.” In addition, a section of the Contractors’ State License Law provided for the issuance of contractors’ licenses only to individuals, partnerships and corporations.

As of this year, the LLC law was changed to add: “…a limited liability company may render services that may be lawfully rendered only pursuant to a license, certificate, or registration authorized by the Business and Professions Code if the applicable provisions of the Business and Professions Code authorize a limited liability company to hold that license, certificate or registration.” The Contractors’ State License Law was changed to allow for individuals, firms, partnerships, corporations, limited liability companies, associations, organizations, or any combination thereof.

Continue reading ›

|

In Part 1 of this entry, I discussed the importance of a business owner choosing the right professional advisors to assist in the sale of the company, whether in San Jose or Palo Alto, and some of the different types of experts.

Although there is overlap, advisors that assist with businesses having a substantial sales price are investment bankers that specialize in mergers and acquisitions. These professionals often help in cleaning up a company’s operations, provide pre-acquisition strategic guidance, act as chief negotiators in the sales transaction, and provide advice and formal opinions concerning deal valuation.

Compensation is a key issue in any agreement with an advisor. Compensation can involve payment of an initial fee, such as where acquisition solicitation materials are prepared, to a commission, such as where the broker takes an active role in negotiations that are successfully closed. Brokers and investment bankers will typically request a non-refundable engagement fee and a success fee. The latter can take many forms. One form provides for a set amount, plus a percentage commission based on the transaction value. Another form provides for a commission percentage which changes with the transaction value, often providing higher percentage commissions for higher values to encourage the advisor to be more aggressive in its pricing negotiations. Exceptions or adjustments to the fee structure are often made for introductions or transactions then in process which were not sourced with the assistance of the professional. Most advisor contracts contain a “tail”, which allows the advisor to collect a success fee for transactions occurring within a certain period, typically 12 – 18 months after the advisory relationship ends. Sometimes the tail can be limited to transactions for which the introduction was made by the advisor.

Advisors can go a long way toward guiding a company and its stakeholders through a successful transaction. Management, however, can’t expect that the advisor will take care of everything involved, and must be prepared to contribute extensively toward the transaction’s success.

Continue reading ›

|

Every business owner at one time or another wants to sell their Silicon Valley business and move from Los Altos, Mountain View or San Jose to Tahoe or Tahiti. Being bogged down in daily operations doesn’t leave a lot of time for an owner to make the necessary contacts to build interest in their company. Owners wish they could just have someone else sell their business.

There are a number of professional advisors that can assist in the sale of a company. Like fundraising, however, management cannot simply pass to someone else a function this important. One of the key reasons for management involvement is that a business buyer is typically found through the company’s own contacts.

As with any advisor, choosing the right professional to advise on potential acquirers and transaction terms is a combination of validation by your network, expertise, and your own personal comfort with the individual with whom you will be working.

Continue reading ›

|

Since 1995 only attorneys, architects and accountants were eligible to practice as a limited liability partnership in California. However, as of September 30, 2010 new rules now allow engineers and land surveyors to take advantage of the LLP form of entity as well.

Although the law currently only extends until January 1, 2016, this is still great news for engineers and land surveyors that may have wanted a liability protection entity for their businesses, but did not want to deal with the hassle of annual meetings and minutes required of a corporation. These businesses are not eligible to be limited liability companies (LLCs) because of the restriction in the LLC Act preventing any business that requires a license or certification under the Business and Professions Act to be an LLC in California.

Section 16306(c) of the California Corporations Code provides in part that: “… a partner in a registered limited liability partnership is not liable or accountable, directly or indirectly, including by way of indemnification, contribution, assessment, or otherwise, for debts, obligations, or liabilities of or chargeable to the partnership or another partner in the partnership, whether arising in tort, contract, or otherwise, that are incurred, created, or assumed by the partnership while the partnership is a registered limited liability partnership, by reason of being a partner or acting in the conduct of the business or activities of the partnership.”

This liability protection is a very important reason to operate your business through an LLP.

Continue reading ›

|

Any large business transaction, particularly a merger or acquisition, requires a well-coordinated team for success. Assembling your team early on makes a large difference between success and failure, whether you are in San Jose, California or Sydney, Australia.

The most critical advisors are your attorney and your accountant. If you are a business owner and you don’t have an attorney or an accountant advising your company, you need to get one now. Although either professional can “parachute in” to assist your company in the event of a sale, their advice to you will be much more efficient and effective if they have direct and long term experience with your company. Failing to have ongoing advice in legal, tax, and financial matters will likely result in the need for remedial work and higher expense in closing a business sale.

Finding a suitable attorney will likely be your first task in assembling your business team. As with any advisor, you should use your referral network to find a professional that is appropriate to your business. You should only choose someone who you believe can act as a trusted, strategic advisor in planning, growing, and selling your business, rather than someone who can merely produce documents. An attorney who you allow to attend your board and/or shareholder meetings and generally become familiar with your business will be able to advise you on building the proper foundation for an ultimate sale of your business. He or she will also be able to tailor their advice to the realities of your business and your own risk preferences.

Continue reading ›

|

Whether your business is located in Silicon Valley or somewhere else, whenever you hire someone, that worker is either an independent contractor or an employee. Using the correct classification is crucial because federal and state governments are targeting businesses with incorrectly classified employees to collect substantial employment taxes and penalties. In addition, workers may sue for employee benefits they claim they should have been eligible for.

How do you determine the proper classification?

The IRS and the state governments have different tests. The IRS tells you to consider behavioral control (do you have the right to control what will be done and how?), financial control (is the worker offering their services to others and incurring their own costs?), and relationship of the parties (more than just the title of any employment contract). California boils it down to one question: Does the employer have the right to direct and control the manner and means in which the worker carries out the job? If the answer to that is not clear, there are ten secondary factors to consider.

Continue reading ›

|

What should you do to get your company documentation ready for a potential merger or acquisition? Consult your lawyer. First, he or she will assist the company in getting its basic corporate minute book updated. Important transactions, such as those involving company stock or stock options, appointment or election of directors and officers, and substantial transactions should all be properly documented. The company’s stock book and capitalization table should be reviewed for accuracy, particularly if there are multiple owners. If the company has gone through equity financings or debt financings, closing binders containing the material documents in each of these transactions will need to be made available.

Second, your lawyer should review existing documentation for legal traps. The minefield that poorly prepared documentation presents is extensive, but a few examples can help illustrate the problem. Companies early on may not be able to afford employees, so they will use independent contractors to help create their basic technology. If the company does not have a signed agreement from the non-employee inventor assigning all rights to the company, the inventor, not the company, owns the technology. If the same company has licensed its technology under a purchase order that provides for a transfer of title, then the company now may not own its own technology because it just transferred to the customer title to its technology. Of course, because it didn’t get an assignment from the inventor in the first place, it may not have been legally able to transfer the technology to the customer, so the company may now be in breach. Situations like this do not typically advance closing dates.

Another legal trap exists in confidentiality terms, common to many contracts. These provisions prevent you from disclosing important information you receive from the other party. Often, this information includes the contract itself. As a result, you’ll need to get permission from the other party to disclose the contract. When you ask the other party to disclose, they will want to know who the recipient will be. At that point, you’ll need to disclose the name of the acquirer, and likely the fact that your company is being sold. The fact that you are being sold may not make the other party to your contract very happy. All of this requires you to make sure you know where you are under confidentiality, and to have a strategy where the disclosure requires delicate handling.

Continue reading ›

|

Even in the San Francisco Bay Area, buying a business is like buying a house. You wouldn’t do it without performing due diligence and a good inspection. Unlike a house, however, strengths and challenges in a business lie in its relationships, and not necessarily in its building. For this reason, buyers will spend a significant amount of time in reviewing a company’s documentation before any merger or acquisition.

A buyer reviews documentation for a number of reasons. Many are business-oriented, such as whether the company has good title to its technology, has solid supply and strategic relationships, and has not overextended itself in promises made to customers or employees.

The fastest way for the sale of your company to implode is for you to be unable to deliver a complete record of your company to a buyer. It is typical for a company hoping to sell itself to make available online their corporate documentation promptly after a letter of intent is signed. The longer it takes to make this documentation available, the longer it will take to close the sale. A long sale process is almost never to the seller’s advantage. Worse, not having information readily available creates a perception that the company is disorganized. This will increase the perceived risk to the buyer and will further lengthen the time to close.

Continue reading ›